A-Team cutting rep group funding in interests of ‘normal’ students
By | 24 Sep, 2007
The A-Team’s threats of pulling rep group funding have prompted the heads of most rep groups to unite as a group, United Students. United Students is aiming to keep student representation, advocacy and support strong at Vic in the wake of the A-teams policies.
Disabled students’ rep group Can-Do President Rongomaiwahine Higgins called the presidents together, and says, “representative groups often form the basis of student action and communication within Vic. If something is wrong, if something needs to be resisted or done we already have the lines of communication in place and the structures to resist and fight for students.”
The group includes Can-Do, UniQ, PGSA and Ngai Tauira.
Ngai Tauira is speaking out against the A-Team’s policies, despite a recent promise to “not touch their funding.” Tumuaki Maryjane Waru suggests “a little social responsibility” should be added to the A-Team’s campaign.
UniQ president Laressa Donaldson agrees, stating that rep groups “exist for people and groups who need advocacy and support.”
Donaldson believes that taking away VUWSA financial backing for rep groups “shows a lack of respect and little appreciation for diversity.”
When Salient contacted A-Team Council Rep candidate Jordan Williams about United Students, Williams confused the rep groupwith clubs such as Debsoc and the Young Nats.
After some initial confusion over the difference between a rep group and a club, Williams completely disagreed with the criticism of the A-Team’s policies. Williams argues that the A-Team is for rep groups “but we are also looking out for what the normal … uh … sorry, I mean average student thinks.”
Presidential candidate and current Education Vice President Joel Cosgrove says this shows “the A-Team’s whole campaign is built on a lack of understanding of both VUWSA and students.”
Current President Geoff Hayward, who is seeking re-election, agrees that this highlights their lack of understanding and experience, “and students should be concerned.”
Can-Do told Salient identifying with a rep group “is not something you can necessarily choose” whereas membership to a club is completely voluntary. United Students is concerned about the continued existence of rep groups at Victoria if the A-team is elected.
Waru describes the A-Team’s attitudes as “foolish” and “wishful thinking” that students will want to give the A-Team’s proposed $25 refund to rep groups.
Williams argues that the best representative groups in New Zealand “look after themselves” with no funding from students’ associations, and “everyone wants to join them because they are so awesome.”
Donaldson believes that no financial backing from VUWSA will seriously limit the ability of rep groups to serve students. United Students cautions students “to think carefully and explore their options before they vote.”
Latest article comments
ASPA Awards - A time to be self indulgent: Lynyrd Skynyrd
1 Oct, 2008 @ 10:24 am
ASPA Awards - A time to be self indulgent: Michael Oliver
1 Oct, 2008 @ 7:06 am
ASPA Awards - A time to be self indulgent: Jackson Wood
1 Oct, 2008 @ 5:03 am
Eye on Candidates’ Forum: Jackson Wood
1 Oct, 2008 @ 4:57 am
ASPA Awards - A time to be self indulgent: Annoy Mouse
1 Oct, 2008 @ 1:43 am
Depression is a Jerk: Cappadonna
1 Oct, 2008 @ 12:29 am
Gang Land: pen-15
30 Sep, 2008 @ 10:57 pm
Vinyl - The beauty of: Superior Mind
30 Sep, 2008 @ 10:40 pm
A Challenge to the Left: cvalda
30 Sep, 2008 @ 10:33 pm
ASPA Awards - A time to be self indulgent: Tristan Egarr
30 Sep, 2008 @ 9:58 pm
He says, she says continues as voting underway Salient growing weary
29 September, 2008
Connors causes panda-monium
29 September, 2008
Eye on Candidates’ Forum
29 September, 2008
Eye on Exec
29 September, 2008
VUWSA meets, surprisingly people turn up
29 September, 2008
Salient interviews presidential candidates
29 September, 2008
Fraud Jackson Wood
29 September, 2008, 2:25 pm
McQuillanation of the candidnation Laura McQuillan
27 September, 2008, 5:27 pm
ASPA Awards - A time to be self indulgent Jackson Wood
25 September, 2008, 11:05 pm
Fear and Loathing on the VUWSA campaign trail - The video evidence Jackson Wood
24 September, 2008, 10:08 am
Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail - VUWSA Elections ‘09 Jackson Wood
23 September, 2008, 7:47 pm
PGSA Statement on VUWSA Elections Salient
23 September, 2008, 12:23 pm

Comments
blogette
September 24th, 2007 at 10:07 am
I’ll tell you what’s wishful thinking…, VUWSA giving hundreds of thousands of dollars to an organisation that isn’t even an incorpirate society… and consistently fails in its attempts to be one… that had a treasurer recently indicted for fraud… for ripping off students
that’s the real disgrace
i don’t know how waru can show her face in the pages of salient
blogettedaidiot
September 24th, 2007 at 10:40 am
No Blogette, wishing thinking is that Jordan believes that normal…uh… sorry… average students are rich white males. The Women’s Group represents women on campus, and the campus is comprised of more women than males, therefore, the normal…um… sorry… average student is a woman.
I am glad that Jordan admits that the A-Team are for rich white males. Although it looks like it’s going down for the A-Team, maybe it’s a sign for all rich white males.
blogette
September 24th, 2007 at 10:49 am
i’m not even talking about your fucking women’s group
women’s group gets almost no funding and doesbasically nothing so what are you complaining about
Michael Oliver
September 24th, 2007 at 11:19 am
“I’m not even talking about your fucking women’s group” would make an awesome album title.
blogette
September 24th, 2007 at 11:34 am
yeah
fuck yeah!
Georgie Dickson
September 24th, 2007 at 7:05 pm
//i’m not even talking about your fucking women’s group
women’s group gets almost no funding and doesbasically nothing so what are you complaining about//
Excuuuse me?
What on earth would you know about the women’s group does or does not do, you ignorant git?
I don’t believe Gabby or I have received any inquiries from you about what the women’s group has been up to this year. If you wanted an example of some of the stuff that women’s group are up to , you could’ve come to the multitude of women’s fest events last week. (which incidentally had fantastic turnouts for most events and went really smoothly)
Georgie Dickson
September 24th, 2007 at 7:25 pm
…Oh I forgot, all the A-Team care about are rich, able bodied, heterosexual, predominantly white males. Why would they bother asking about women’s group?
The A-Team can rabbit on about “Free choice” all they like, but I don’t think that you “choose” to be disabled, in an ethnic minority, a woman or queer. Being that most candidates don’t come under any of these labels, I think it’s pretty rich of them to suggest that these groups don’t need representation and support at Uni.
A-team, How would you ever know what it’s like to deal with coming out or be called a “stupid monkey” in a racial context? Oh, you wouldn’t, that’s why you think these issues aren’t worthy of consideration. The fact that Jordan Williams didn’t even know the difference between a rep group and a club makes this point patently clear.
Time to branch outside your own little bubble and be a tad more conscious I think.
Sara R
September 24th, 2007 at 7:38 pm
Just remember Georgie, it’s not the A Team who have consistently and viciously labelled Anna Duggan a “whore”.
Nicholas O'Kane
September 24th, 2007 at 7:56 pm
” Being that most candidates don’t come under any of these labels, I think it’s pretty rich of them to suggest that these groups don’t need representation and support at Uni.”
Arguements like this often come up in threads about minority groups. Can it ever be possible to debate the arguements and not the people?
Returning Officer
September 25th, 2007 at 10:12 am
as per the constitution… It shall be the responsibility of the candidates to remove as far physically possible all election propaganda……
Submitting a comment to this blog is involving your self and adding to the propaganda. Please don’t break the rules…. It will only open yourself up for a dispute to be laid against you.
Joe
September 25th, 2007 at 11:16 am
I think it should also be pointed that Anna Duggan is a member of a rep group (Can-Do) as she has both a medical and hearing disability. She is getting my vote because she is the BEST candidate to represent diasbled students because she is one herself.
Furthermore, Anna is not the person on the A-Team with a disability, two other members also use DSS due to hearing and other disabilities, yet you do not hear them harping on about needing there funding.
doug
September 25th, 2007 at 11:45 am
Anna said that, if she gets in, all she will do is direct ‘students in need’ into town, and tell them where to find welfare services. So I guess that she will spend a day drawing up a map, and then she won’t do anything else for the rest of the year, but still will get paid.
How does this represent students, Joe (A-Team)? Using the A-Team argument, a person does not need to be part of the group, to be the best person for the role, most of the A-Team people running for the representative positions are not part of the specific groups.
Joe
September 25th, 2007 at 11:56 am
No Anna will work with students to get the best from facilities in town. During her campaign she has alread started helping some students better understand Studylink and even has accompanied one girl to studylink who approached her during her campaign.
Anna is probably the best person to vote for on the A-Team as she is the one who genuinely cares about student welfare and what is best to make sure that they can survive life while at uni.
Submit a comment
**NEW** You can now register as a user to post a comment.