Skip navigation.

You are here > Home / Blog / Protests Galore II

Protests Galore II

By Tristan Egarr | 26 Apr, 2008

Comments (7) Skip to comment form


Today, somewhere between 500 and 1000 young Chinese people marched from Pipitea campus to Civic Square. VUWSA International Officer and CSAVUW (Victoria Uni Chinese Student’s Association) leader William Wu only began organising the rally a week ago. The solidarity between Chinese students, and their organizational abilities, puts every other VUW students’ protest I’ve attended to shame. Furthermore, although the leaders asked me (as one of the only “Kiwis” i.e. whities around) if the police would mind them marching on the road, and I replied that there was no way the police would stop 300 people (my impression of the crowd at that early stage) from marching, when the march actually took place, its leaders confined it to the pavement – so not only was this rally weirdly well-organised (when compared to most marches), it was also stunningly polite.

The organizers told both Salient and Fairfax reporters that the rally was non-political: they were not arguing that China should rule Tibet, rather they were merely voicing support for the Olympics and arguing that the Western media has shown a bias against China, for example in showing anti-Chinese protests along the London torch route, but not the simultaneous pro-Chinese rallies.

However, this message became confused, because a large number of marchers held “One China” banners, such as “China: 56 ethnicities, one family.” So underlying the main, keep-politics-out-of-the-Olympics message, was a distinctly political current. However, as William said, they were hardly going to stop people on the march from expressing their opinions. But it is worth noting that when some marchers raised the chant “One China! One family!” almost everyone joined in, so describing this as a non-political protest is not entirely accurate.

My favourite of their chants was the following:
“What do we want? Olympics!
What do we love? Friendship!
What do we hate? Protestors!”
Certainly a strange chant to heard from what ostensibly looked like a protest march.

The chant “Welcome to Beijing! Welcome to China!” was often followed up with “New Zealand people are awesome,” and the young Chinese marchers waved a few NZ flags alongside their red Chinese ones. Many will no doubt snubb their noses at this protest and remind us of Tibet. And of course we shouldn’t forget Tibet, but we also shouldn’t forget that, at the moment, the level of human destruction the US is enacting on Iraq is greater than that inflicted by China on Tibet, which is more about cultural swamping than bombs. And we should remember not to be so arrogant about China’s crimes, given that the West isn’t spotless. So the one point the Chinese rally is absolutely right on is that we must first become “friends” with China if we want its people to listen when we suggest changes.

There were absolutely no Falun Gong or Free Tibet protestors in sight, which I found very odd. One guy at Vodafone Homegrown tried to chant “free Tibet,” but his girlfriend put her hand over his mouth. Then some rocker chicks joined in the march for a minute to have their photos taken. When we got to civic square one guy kept saying he wanted to protest for Tibet, but I guess he felt outnumbered (see last photo).

[Edit] - William has just informed me that the protest was intended to be 50-100 people, and he is slightly concerned both that so many people showed up in such an organised manner, and that they used the march to send out a political message. So the plot thickens…









Comments

Conrad Reyners
April 26th, 2008 at 5:43 pm

Breaking News: Third Terran outpost overrun by Zerg rush.

Jackson Wood
April 26th, 2008 at 6:34 pm

Fantastic!

I wish I had been there with my Chinese flag!

Gibbon
April 26th, 2008 at 6:43 pm

What is your basis for saying that bombs are worse than “cultural swamping”?
thankxs

Tristan Egarr
April 26th, 2008 at 6:56 pm

Bombing a country creates a “greater level of human destruction” than culturally swamping a country. More death, more injuries. Does this mean bombing is worse? That depends upon how you measure “worse” - one could argue that at least Iraq will still have its cultural integrity, whereas Tibet soon won’t, and that therefore the swamping is worse. So in the short term, the situation in Iraq is worse than that in Tibet, but in the long term? I don’t know.

Andrew
May 1st, 2008 at 3:58 pm

Out of it! and don’t forget that yesterday some obscure christian protestors calling themselves Swords Into Plowshares deflated one of the Waihopai Spy Base’s Sattelite domes. Classic!

Kerry
May 4th, 2008 at 1:38 pm

Andrew - LOL!

The Ploughshares protesters have been going in the USA for some 30 years, most frequently praying next to nuclear weapons after tipping buckets of blood over them.

They’re a well-known feature of the anti-nuclear-weapons debate in the USA, and on US bases around the world.

The point of their involvement here is that Echelon is a US deployment on NZ soil, and all the data just goes straight to the USA without any analysis or decryption done in NZ.

CND and Greenpeace anti-nukes campaigns are better-known here, because the admixture of christian politicking and activism is less emphasised in our more secular political environment.

The USA has a greater history of religious groups lobbying politicians, and being very powerful from that context. One explanation for the US military continuance in Iraq, for instance, draws on fundamentalist christian beliefs in a final armagheddon war, to take place between the armies of the North and the armies of the South, in the Euphrates River basin (the border area between Iran and Iraq), which is a favourite rallying cry of Bush supporters in the Southern Bible-belt states.

Not unsurprisingly, the rest of the USA is running out of patience for that idea, as recent publications such as The Bush Tragedy, by Jacob Weisberg, or Reagan’s Disciple: George W Bush’s Troubled Quest for a Presidential Legacy, by Washington reporters Lou and Carl Cannon, would attest.

Kerry
May 4th, 2008 at 2:18 pm

Just found this, more on the Ploughshares background - read the comments, several links to old Ploughshares actions in the UK & USA

http://blog.greens.org.nz/index.php/2008/05/01/you-must-be-the-change-you-want-to-see-in-the-world/

Submit a comment

**NEW** You can now register as a user to post a comment.

Important! By commenting on this website, you are agreeing to the Salient Internet Policy Guidlines.

Tristan Egarr

Tristan Egarr has strong feet and two elbows and when he is afraid he twitches his nose but he is not made up of moments. He eats all his food. Tristan is a filthy hippy in summer, a worrisome goth is winter, and a mediocre historian the rest of the year.

Other articles by Tristan Egarr

Latest article comments

Last call: as
20 Nov, 2008 @ 8:08 pm

The Great Wellington SUBURB Review: jewels
20 Nov, 2008 @ 2:02 pm

Movember: Jackson Wood
19 Nov, 2008 @ 10:59 am

Movember: Matthew_Cunningham
19 Nov, 2008 @ 10:56 am

Justin Doyle: DIGGA
18 Nov, 2008 @ 1:49 pm

The storm before the storm: Wee Hamish
18 Nov, 2008 @ 1:11 pm

The storm before the storm: Electrum Stardust
17 Nov, 2008 @ 11:04 am

The storm before the storm: Wee Hamish
16 Nov, 2008 @ 1:43 pm

The storm before the storm: Electrum Stardust
16 Nov, 2008 @ 10:37 am

Unicomm and the horrible history of our halls: Gibbon
14 Nov, 2008 @ 9:49 pm

Advertisement

student job search

Advertise with us

Last call Jackson Wood
14 November, 2008, 5:54 pm

Movember Jackson Wood
12 November, 2008, 12:54 pm

Hope and Fear Tristan Egarr
8 November, 2008, 11:44 am

THE LAST-MINUTE ELECTION GUIDE TO ELECTION GUIDES Rory MacKinnon
30 October, 2008, 12:55 pm

I was poked by Helen Clark (and I liked it) Dr Peter Manglethwaite
21 October, 2008, 1:38 pm

Awesome! Free show Salient
20 October, 2008, 2:18 pm

Poll

So, hypothetically, if we were to go glossy, how would you feel about it?
View Results