(Classic Film Review) Debbie Does Dallas
By | 29 Mar, 2004
When I realised that there are only two people who ever read my classic film columns (Mum, stop reading now), I thought I’d try the oldest trick in the book to increase readership. This review will probably end up being a masturbatory (probably the wrong choice of word) account of my embarrassment of getting this video out, but it’s surprising how many of your mates are willing to help you out when your “research” involves porn (to facilitate in the understanding of this review we shall call a couple of them, “Gareth Prosser” and “Andy Moonlight”)
So is this movie any good? Does it deserve its status in the pantheon of porn? This film was first recommended by my fifth form history teacher (I still don’t know what this had to do with the causes of World War Two…). I was intrigued, is Dallas a person? (no) Well, there is a plot. Kind of. It’s shattering in its realism – tan lines, cellulite, hair (it was the 70s) – which leads me to wonder, is porn a type of documentary? There’s moments of surrealism (where did that telephone come from on the tennis court? Clothes somehow disappear oh so quickly) It is also the prototype for so many porn clichés – corny dialogue, unbelievable situations, the “playing-hard-to-get” attitude of many of the characters. And it all ends rather anti-climactically with a climax.
Why is porn so bad? Sure it’s objectifying and misogynistic, but so is modern society. No-one would complain if I did reviews of so-called classics like Gone With the Wind or Pretty Woman, yet they’re incredibly sexist.
Is it because it seems to be the domain of seedy old men? I say cast off those raincoats of shame, there’s nothing wrong with sex. If there were no sex, we probably wouldn’t even be scum-sucking bacteria in an overheated ocean. As human beings we cannot deny our attraction to anything sexual. There’s only so many times that you can pretend the channel accidentally switched onto a Britney Spears video. The fact that you have got this far into this review, suggests so too.
Director: Who cares?
United States
Latest article comments
Wood replaces Egarr: Jenna the Bassist
6 Jan, 2009 @ 3:34 pm
Live Review: The Black Keys: Jenna the Bassist
6 Jan, 2009 @ 3:30 pm
Why Do Chicks Play Bass?: Jenna the Bassist
6 Jan, 2009 @ 3:26 pm
Why Do Chicks Play Bass?: Base Spot
6 Jan, 2009 @ 3:23 pm
Asexual club: Han Solo
6 Jan, 2009 @ 3:21 pm
Wellington Hospital: Wee Hamish
5 Jan, 2009 @ 11:41 am
Wellington Hospital: soreteeth
5 Jan, 2009 @ 9:40 am
Live Review: The Black Keys: Wee Hamish
3 Jan, 2009 @ 2:01 pm
Asexual club: badrouni houcine
2 Jan, 2009 @ 8:48 pm
Live Review: The Black Keys: Robbo 24
2 Jan, 2009 @ 8:03 pm
Eye on Council
8 December, 2008
The storm before the storm
7 November, 2008
VUWSA election results announced, Freemantle new President
6 October, 2008
Salient third best publication in the world
6 October, 2008
Wood replaces Egarr
6 October, 2008
Fees probably going up
6 October, 2008
Eye on Council Tristan Egarr
8 December, 2008, 12:54 pm
Hi, I’m Salient Salient
4 December, 2008, 3:34 pm
Kiwi Connection: Backhouse in Bangkok Matthew Backhouse
26 November, 2008, 3:53 pm
Movember Gala Jackson Wood
24 November, 2008, 10:02 am
Last call Jackson Wood
14 November, 2008, 5:54 pm
Movember Jackson Wood
12 November, 2008, 12:54 pm

Submit a comment
**NEW** You can now register as a user to post a comment.